Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan Watmore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan Watmore[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL at the moment. JMHamo (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is an article about a young footballer who has not received any significant third-part coverage, failing WP:GNG. He has also not yet played in a fully-professional league so he also fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Recreate if/when these concerns are met. Giant Snowman 14:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:56, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Walls of Jericho (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means it fails WP:NFOOTY. I can't find any in-depth coverage in reliable sources, except transfer-news, so it also fails WP:GNG. No prejudice against recreation once one of the criteria has been met. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.