Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duck walk killer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpg jhp jm 18:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duck walk killer[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At best, this is too soon for an article, but there's a good chance this will never have sustained notability. Natureium (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Good sources. Not too soon at all. Also per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 19:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - But I may be biased living in the neighborhood affected. ―Buster7 ☎ 23:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I was about to say shootings in Chicago are WP:MILL, however on examining the coverage it seems it is national,[1][2][3][4] and international.[5] Per WP:RAPID and scope/scale of coverage this should be retained at present. Whether coverage continues to be persistent should be assessed at a later date as at present it requires a crystal ball.Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep certainly passes WP:GNG.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:RAPID - this is a developing story drawing wide attention. E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.