Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drugstore June

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify.‎. Moving to draft space. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drugstore June[edit]

Drugstore June (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film fails WP:NFF. The only sources are press-release announcements of the release date. There is no production information that has been reported in order to satisfy the guideline that the production itself is notable. Only knowing the release date only tells us that it was filmed, not that it was notable. This should be sent back to draft until someone uncovers some information on the filming, or until the film is released and receives at least a couple reviews to meet WP:NFO #1. Until that happens, this is a WP:CRYSTALBALL. For all we know, this could get released with nobody reviewing it, leaving the WP article without any notable information. - 2pou (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. 2pou (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify - making clear as the nominator that sending back to draft to preserve the work thus far is my preference over deletion. I'd have sent back to draft, but that was already done. -2pou (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Have you even glanced at the cast list? Why not nominate their entries for deletion and see what happens? Choclair (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would not nominate those entries, because each one has established its own notability, warranting a WP article, while this has not. Notability of a film is WP:NOTINHERITED from the cast that makes it up; it needs its own coverage. If that entire cast joined together to create a commercial, it would not be notable unless some independent sources covered it in a significant manner. -2pou (talk) 22:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify: Six months of development may make a difference. Should go through AfC before returning to mainspace.  // Timothy :: talk  03:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.