Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dre Rich Kidd (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and salt. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 19:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dre Rich Kidd[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cant see anything that at present the person passes WP:GNG TheLongTone (talk) 16:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt again as nothing else has actually changed and that emphasizes by how the information is still no different and better. Should this ever be accepted, it will be by multi-review, not a full start article alone. SwisterTwister talk 17:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Clearly not notable, speedied four times per WP:A7. Already sent to AfD with result WP:SNOW delete. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 19:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.