Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dre Rich Kidd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. ‑ Iridescent 21:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dre Rich Kidd[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:MUSBIO, WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:ANYBIO/WP:GNG. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note also another article with the exact contents and I actually PRODed it, Drè Rich Kidd. SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which I deleted as an A10 speedy...Lectonar (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and we both collided nominating it, there's simply nothing suggesting imaginably better for the applicable notability and it's likely best too soon. SwisterTwister talk 19:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)^{[author missing]}[reply]

Delete, per nomination. Not seeing anything notable about it. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 19:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE This Musician is a well-known Celebrity hosted by MTV — Preceding unsigned comment added by CEOBryantR (talk • contribs) 22:34, May 18, 2016‎

CEOBryantR is the article's author and has has made no edits outside this topic. Meters (talk) 22:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If he's a "well-known celebrity", why have you provided no evidence of it? Maproom (talk) 20:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing new since 2009, and MTV link is an exact copy of this article. Nate • (chatter) 01:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Based on their request at WP:RFPP, there also appears to be a conflict of interest with the article's primary contributor. Wani (talk) 18:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no reliable sources and nothing out there that I can see. The MTV.com database entry has a "contains content from artists, fans, and writers from around the internet in it's natural form. Such content is not representative of Viacom Media Networks" disclaimer along the bottom and it seems possible for anybody to make a page there. --McGeddon (talk) 18:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blatant violation of Wikipedia:Advertising--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, purely promotional. BMK (talk) 20:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned it up, got rid of a lot of the garbage, still non-notable. BMK (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the previous prod & speedy delete, title should be salted as well. BMK (talk) 21:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Excessively promotional, no evidence of notability. Maproom (talk) 20:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely promotional and advertising. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable spam. Also, probably time to invoke the snow clause. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being party of a Disney Radio incubator program for young artists doesn't satisfy WP:MUSIC notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.