Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Doughty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Doughty[edit]

Doug Doughty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability warning has been up for 7 years without reliable sources added that are centered on the subject. Omnibus (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete longtime columnist for The Roanoke Times, a wellregarded newspaper, but I am not seeing coverage of him. If anyone is able to source WP:SIGCOV of this journalist or of the things he has written, please ping me to reconsider.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete What we would need is actual sources that show that Doughty's actions were trend setting. What we have now is way too much sourcing to his own works, we need sources about him.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.