Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnell Washington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Heart ^(talk) 14:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Donnell Washington

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Donnell Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rather unnotable guy that fails WP:SPORTBASIC and the only thing he has going for him is that he was drafted into the NFL, however never played a single game. Sources found are very trivial. Heart ^(talk) 05:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Sports, and American football. Heart ^(talk) 05:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Never played, doesn't have significant coverage.--Mvqr (talk) 10:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep Passes GNG with significant coverage such as this [1][2][3] (I added them all to the article). Whether he played professionally or not is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is whether he was covered or not, which he was both during his college and professional years. Alvaldi (talk) 11:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

• I've added several more sources to the article, including these [4][5][6]. The article now has several sources of significant coverage from multiple publications spanning multiple years. Alvaldi (talk) 12:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep - Alvaldi has demonstrated that the subject passes GNG by quite some way Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

• Nomination withdrawn, thanks to the people who added content! I have withdrawn this nomination! Heart ^(talk) 14:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.