Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolf

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 April 3.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 03:50, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dolf[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Game of dubious notability without significant coverage. A Google search for Dolf turned up nothing outside of the Wikipedia article and http://www.dolfdarts.com. That site alleges to be the governing body of the game, but there is a bare minimum of content there: no evidence of international tournaments, no links to leagues or local competitions, no links to press coverage. In the absence of secondary sources to document the game, it fails the general notability guidelines. I'm not saying that nobody plays the game; I'm saying that this variant, as created by the named individuals, is not notable. —C.Fred (talk) 03:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not suficient notability The Eskimo (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (as original prodder): Non-notable game variant. ... discospinster _talk 03:52, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Other than the aforementioned "official" website, there is a total lack of sources to verify anything. Most darts game variations are not notable. This is just another one of those. _wjemather^bigissue 08:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- On further inspection it seems to be a variation of another darts game variant, Golf (darts), which is not notable either. _wjemather ^bigissue 16:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.