Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dlala Lukid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dlala Lukid[edit]

Dlala Lukid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable “Dj” who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them, thus do not satisfy WP:GNG and also doesn’t seem to satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO or WP:ENT. Celestina007 (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • del no independent coverage; very small number of google hits. Lembit Staan (talk) 17:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • strong delete, easily WP:A7 -Xclusivzik (talk) 10:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - non-notable musician, the only Google hits point towards self-published and user-generated sites and does not turn up any reliable independent sources that substantially talk about the subject. --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:07, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.