Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Directorgifty
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as spam. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Directorgifty[edit]
- Directorgifty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to show importance (no sources) - page created by editor shows a blatant conflict of interest - look at page creator's name - could qualify for speedy by A7 (there was a A7/G11 tag, which was removed by the page creator). Has previously been speedied by A7 five times prior. GammaRadiator (talk) 09:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- @GammaRadiator: It wasn't removed by a third party, it was removed by the page creator(which is not permitted) who seems to be the subject of the page. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- @331dot: Noted and nomination altered in light of info. Thanks :)
- @GammaRadiator: It wasn't removed by a third party, it was removed by the page creator(which is not permitted) who seems to be the subject of the page. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Delete WP:A7 and Salt. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.