Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Director Edward Jeffries

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Director Edward Jeffries[edit]

Director Edward Jeffries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a claim of notability, but imo it doesn't wash. TheLongTone (talk) 17:56, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The claim of notability amounts to having directed a number of independent, non-notable films. No independent sources to denote notability. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for your opinion. If you check the reference links you'll see verifiable sources confirming these films which are also very real and avalible Ondemand via your TV if you got one. Also the casting credits for these movies are of notable people such as the mayor of port Adelaide and many others. Also two films are of popular places and officially filmed. If it wasn't officaly filmed then how else would the movies exist.

It seems excuse after excuse for not having this person listed over later by a dead mayor whome got very little references and incorrectly named as I'm sick of looking up this director and finding bad articles names about the wrong people.

Please reconsider. A thankyou message will be made if so. Any help improving the article be handy . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.183.186.239 (talk) 18:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC) — 49.183.186.239 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Comment Jeffries directed a The Royal Adelaide Show, apparently a commercial video documenting one year's Royal Adelaide Show. This hardly makes him a notable director. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WikiDan61 - no evidence of him coming close to meeting WP:CREATIVE yet. In a few years maybe. Best of luck to him. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 22:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • COMMENTS: Note the legal threat in the article's history: [1]. Also note a large amount of copyvio: [2]. CrowCaw 23:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • COMMENTS: iv seen Jeffries work on channel 44 along with others TV channels. There's at least another 3-4 movies not listed here. From memory a medieval fair2006-7, Christmas2014 & hobby trains 2009 and a short film about recycling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.183.206.118 (talk) 01:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC) — 49.183.206.118 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Noted doing multiple Theatre [1] [2] 49.183.194.154 (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)— 49.183.194.154 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.starnow.com.au/edwardJeffries
  2. ^ Http://film-makers.com/cgi-bin/links/search.cgi?query=edward+jeffries
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • COMMENTS cant believe aint notable considering Readind the company's mo tat he founded. quotes they give everyone a chance of filming movies without any price tags. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.199.1.172 (talk) 01:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC) — 49.199.1.172 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Delete - Per WP:GNG. I couldn't find any secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject to establish notability what-so-ever. The sources listed on the article (with the exception of imdb) are from websites that are owned by the article subject, or social media / web profiles. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep the above message is incorrect not all sites are owned by persons/company. Get your facts right!49.183.175.43 (talk) 03:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Those so called deleaters should be ashamed. None of you have done anything even as close to what this director has and your just a big joke thinking your so big when your nothing but children. I say keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.199.2.205 (talk) 03:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC) — 49.199.2.205 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

*Keeper ~~kitty~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.199.172.178 (talk) 03:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC) — 19.199.172.178 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

*Verifiable notability: Flixster Celebrity Red~Adman (talk) 04:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)— Red~Adman (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Objection to Deletion: notable independent references:

[http://www.flixster.com/celebrity/edward-jeffries Flixster Celebrity Celebrity mention - first movie 22,000 seen & rated with 86% liked his film if more than 22,000 people seen and rated this film then liked it that's got to be noteworthy. movie he directed notably mentioned on IGN Entertainment NOTE: These referances sites do not belong to him or his company. Give this page a chance to grow ais more movies are in the works. It should also be noted his company allow people to work with him and do much more than just make movies, film or music but also provide Internet, phone credits and other items. imo this will continue to grow. You've asked for independent sources and they have been provided. Please keep article. Red~Adman (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The various SPAs that have arrived to fight for this article are misled; your arguments amount largely to "I like it, so we should keep it." The fact that you might have seen Jeffries' work is irrelevant. What we need are instances of significant coverage of Jeffries in independent media. Listings of his works in film directories is not considered significant coverage. Reviews of his movies at Rotten Tomatoes also does not provide the necessary source material. Find us some independently published coverage of Jeffries or his work, and we might be able to get somewhere. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - None of this is convincing for the applicable notability, WP:TNT at best and restart later, SwisterTwister talk 01:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete fails WP:BIO. the swarming of single purpose editors is a tell tale sign of conflict of interest. LibStar (talk) 07:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should we regard that as a legitimate draft or delete it under WP:NOTRESUME? --DanielRigal (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I mentioned it here, as I suspect that user page to be likely created by the same user(s) as this article - given the comparable activity from 2013[3][4].
As far as what to do with it - I think an argument could be given for WP:NOTRESUME; or at the very least, I think a WP:MFD discussion would be appropriate, given the disruption related to the material and the long-term socking involved with no apparent improvement in the draft over the years. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've redacted the votes of all blocked users and confirmed sockpuppets. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete:, as per above. Not sufficiently notable. Aeonx (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not even close to being notable. The only "movie" the article links to is actually a kids TV show where he was an assistant. The rest is even thinner than that. Google has almost nothing, even when you tweak the search links to compensate for the misnaming of the article. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete removing this page from Wikipedia will apparently hurt somebody's feelings, but that is not a valid reason for keeping someone who doesn't have the required notability. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I've just deleted most of the article's prose as a copyright violation from here. Hut 8.5 22:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well played, Hut 8.5. Well played... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Director_Edward_Jeffries&oldid=1137788975"