Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dionna Dal Monte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Victor Colicchio#Personal life. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dionna Dal Monte[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician whose only claim to fame is by raising a bit of a kerfuffle over the question of whether she is a neo-Nazi or not. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:15, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn´t agree more. The page should be deleted. Antifascisti (talk) 14:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the nom. Her attention-starved antics may have caused a brief controversy among bloggers, but she's hardly notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:25, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Victor Colicchio#Personal life. All she's known for at this point in time is for her now infamous tattoo. There was a small amount of coverage, but nowhere near enough for this to be considered anything other than WP:ONEEVENT. If she gains any more coverage outside of that point, this article can always be re-created. Until that point, she just hasn't had enough coverage to really be considered notable enough for her own article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.