Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dianoitika proikismenos anthropous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 01:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dianoitika proikismenos anthropous[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIC Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 01:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, dictionary definition, possible original research. No sources whatsoever. JIP | Talk 08:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not quite a dictionary definition, nor WP:OR, but it doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 15:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete probably an attempt at introducing a neologism, and badly spelled at that. I am not aware of this term being used in a technical manner even in Greek. Constantine ✍ 20:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:RS is not optional. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources and no indication of notability. I did a Google search and couldn't find anything that could pass for a source. Richwales (talk · contribs) 03:46, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.