Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Perkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Perkins[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear the meet any of the criteria at WP:NSCHOLAR. JMWt (talk) 16:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Psychiatry, and United States of America. JMWt (talk) 16:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as a Full Professor at a major research university whose research work has an h-index score of 109 (i10-index 288), and who recently received a $52-million grant from the National Insitute of Health, I am pretty sure she meets WP:NPROF. Netherzone (talk) 17:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a high citation field but with first-author or single-author papers having citation counts of 1640, 799, 651, 310, etc [1] she passes WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A citation profile good enough to stand out in a high-citation-rate field indicates a pass of WP:PROF#C1. XOR'easter (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passed PROF-C1. --Mvqr (talk) 11:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.