Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destine (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. SoWhy 14:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Destine[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Articles for deletion/Destine
- Articles for deletion/Destine (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Destined To Lead
- Articles for deletion/Destined Universal
- Articles for deletion/Destined for Greatness
- Articles for deletion/Destined to Fester
- Articles for deletion/Destinee & Paris
- Articles for deletion/Destinee Arnold
- Articles for deletion/Destiney Sue Moore
- Destine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Previously deleted in an AfD. Still non-notable. Created by a single purpose account, not viable for speedy because I wasn't sure if the material was identical, however it doesn't make a direct claim to notability. Jimmi Hugh (talk) 14:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. Not a G4 speedy this time because some attempts have been made to assert notability (unlike last time when there was no notability asserted at all). However, out of the four sources, one appears to be a site where people can post their own reviews, and another is from their own website, neither of this counts. This leaves two articles in webzines, one of which is in Dutch. I don't think this is enough. The partnership with BMG may be promising, but we should wait until and if something comes from that, and not before. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Add ref needed tag to their page. I don't see the harm in keeping it. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think there are enough references to notable coverage to call them notable enough, even in lieu of them not even having a label. They're not blatantly non-notable. Maybe someone could check out the quotations found here and use them as references. I'll add that to the talk page in case someone feels like doing so. ~Pip2andahalf 07:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep international tour = passes WP:MUSIC. No reason to make an exception to the usual notability standards here. WilyD 16:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.