Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destined To Lead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Destined To Lead[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverified, not notable--selfpublished books by a non-notable author. Really, DB-A9 should apply to books as well. Drmies (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Pinging Zeke Essiestudy who previously tagged this for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't seem notable and article isn't the most organized. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 23:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.