Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derick Hall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter (talk) 02:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Derick Hall[edit]

Derick Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCOLLATH and no significant secondary source coverage. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect To Auburn Tigers Emery Cool21 (talk) 12:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Emery Cool21: Why? BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not Notable Football Player, So It Should Redirect To Auburn Tigers Because The Wikipedia Notability Rules Emery Cool21 (talk) 13:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Did you even look at my "keep" rationale? Because right there that's eight pieces of significant coverage, easily passing the general notability guideline ("The Wikipedia Notability Rules"), which states A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I see no way this does not pass. And a redirect does not make sense to me, as that wouldn't really help the reader at all. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.