Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Gupta (researcher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Gupta (researcher)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:ANYBIO. References on the page and in a WP:BEFORE are all about the company LoginRadius which was also deleted from Wikipedia. There are some interviews as well but these are not independent. Having patents or writing books do not automatically qualify someone for Wikipedia. CNMall41 (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CNMall41 (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and India. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:59, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. One of subject's books has >50 citations per Google Scholar [1], not enough on its own. —siro χ o 06:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I wouldn't read too much into individual citation counts. They're really field dependent. Mason (talk) 20:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Just meant as more of a note that it's not strictly an obvious delete, though I currently suspect it will end up there. —siro χ o 23:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.