Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deșteptarea (trade union)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 23:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deșteptarea (trade union)[edit]

Deșteptarea (trade union) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was going to PROD because i couldn't find any SIGCOV, but a previous PROD had been declined. DrowssapSMM 22:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Romania. DrowssapSMM 22:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A newspaper in Detroit [1] with the same name, but seems unrelated. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 23:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - ample sourcing materials availible. Try searching societatea+tipografi+1879 on google books. --Soman (talk) 11:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 23:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Fails GNG and NORG. Single source in article is not SIGCOV, BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and idndpeth.  // Timothy :: talk  19:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.