Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Warwick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David Warwick[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR as all roles in TV series are insignificant (Doctor Who comes the closest, but even that was not a very large role). Lack of sources in the article, and lack of reliable sources available (on Google) also demonstrates this non-notability. Quasar G ^{t - c} 19:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG and NACTOR after checking notability. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 23:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - What is to be gained by deleting this article about a well-known actor?DavidFarmbrough (talk) 00:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you prove that he is well-known? At the moment, the acting roles listed and the sources available do not support this view. Quasar G ^{t - c} 00:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. He's certainly got credits, but I can't find any coverage in reliable sources beyond passing mentions and cast lists. Pburka (talk) 22:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable WP:NACTOR.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 07:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.