Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darmi Khan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to draft. (non-admin closure) ——Serial 11:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Darmi Khan[edit]

Darmi Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not able to find enough information to verify information and notability in this article James Richards (talk) 10:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. James Richards (talk) 10:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. James Richards (talk) 10:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. James Richards (talk) 10:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify (giving it the benefit of the doubt; otherwise delete) This really needs to go back to the draft space, it's nowhere near ready to be published. The text is pretty much incomprehensible, and because of that, and the fact that there are only a couple of wikilinks (and they are to disambiguation pages), it's difficult to even understand quite what the topic is. That would also give a chance to address verifiability: I realise sources don't need to be online, but the way they are currently 'cited' leaves this IMO effectively unreferenced, hence (for now at least) it fails WP:V and consequently WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article"Darmi khan"is very informative and contain correct information about swat and darmi khan.Please do not delete this article.thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.60.12.12 (talk) 13:18, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete non notable --Devokewater @ 20:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify For necessary improvements per DoubleGrazing. desmay (talk) 18:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. I think it will just die a slow death in drafts.   // Timothy :: talk  14:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • at best draftify the article has a link to Swat (a dab page), probably referring either to Swat (princely state) or Swat District, but neither seems to refer to this individual or show that he was significant. He does not seem to be a ruler of the state (who would be notable). We have a long genealogy (s/o is son of) involving ancestors who are apparently NN; and conflicts which I do not identify in the other articles referred to. I have to conclude for the moment that the article is WP:OR relating to a WP:NN person. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.