Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Russell-Pinson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Russell-Pinson[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources found for this individual, what's given in the article is on non-RS sites. Oaktree b (talk) 19:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 19:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This guy has not gotten any more notable since last time. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources are trivial mentions and some are unrelated to the purported notability of the subject. The article fails to establish notability, particularly for the standard required for WP:BLP. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk)
Speedy delete per WP:G4. --Mika1h (talk) 14:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've tagged the article with a speedy deletion tag. Actualcpscm (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.