Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Russell-Pinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Russell-Pinson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Source eval:

Comments	Source
Interview	1. "One-Man Development Firm Finds Sweet Spot in Educational Apps". www.gamesandlearning.org. Retrieved 2023-05-23.
App review, no SIGCOV about subject	2. ^ Hodgepodgedad (2012-02-02). "Stack the States App Review". Your BEST Homeschool. Retrieved 2023-05-23.
One sentence about subject.	3. ^ Ravindranath, Mohana (2012-09-05). "App developers wary of children's online privacy law". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2023-05-23.

BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 21:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Businesspeople, Video games, and North Carolina. Skynxnex (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, undersourced BLP. The entire music section is unsourced. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Mostly unsourced, questionable sources for a biographical article, minimal relevance. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.