Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Stars Ice Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dallas Stars. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 08:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas Stars Ice Girls[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Reason was "Failing of notability per WP:GNG" nominated by CommanderWaterford (ping as a courtesy) I concur with their PROD, and am nominating it here for the same reason Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 09:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom, WP:FANPOV clearly failing WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to the Dallas Stars page where it can have a line or two. I tried to do the gentle thing first by removing the promotional content from the page and tagging it for notability, but this wasn't successful. Fram (talk) 09:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I guess if its put onto the respective parent pages and this is used as a redirect to that page, then I'll be fine. I just think that i sourced it enough that it could remain its own page because of the reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentheswimmer11 (talk • contribs) 09:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - per Fram. A neutral sentence or two on the Dallas Stars article is fine. This article, which is written in a style clearly not suited for an encyclopedia, is not. PraiseVivec (talk) 11:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, as there's zero significant coverage. All the sources used in the article are either non-independent sources or trivial coverage (a listicle, audition information and a Q&A). Ytoyoda (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, a similar article by the same user with the same problems (sketchy sourcing, WP:GNG, promotional tone) was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Hurricanes Storm Squad. Ytoyoda (talk) 20:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Fram. Riteboke (talk) 08:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.