Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalit Genocide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow close. This is ultimately an article written to be a WP:SOAPBOX for a specific cause, complete with a "come to our facebook page" link at the bottom. I also note that despite the editor having been here for a while, their edits seem to be done predominantly as a way to promote specific things or to add things to articles that seem suspiciously like copyvio so a block looks imminent. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:40, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dalit Genocide[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any credible sources that use the term "Dalit Genocide." Furthermore, this is unreferenced and reads like a personal essay. Tchaliburton (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: POV, original research, no sources. Vrac (talk) 01:39, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It appears as though the creator of the article grabbed some statistics from http://www.overcomingviolence.org/en/resources/campaigns/women-against-violence/now-we-are-fearless/dalit-fact-sheet.html. - Location (talk) 03:04, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No Citations or sources. Questionable claims Diagear (talk) 03:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced allegations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -There might be some sort of /hidden/ sources helping one to write an encyclopedic article. But at this time as there appears to none in the existing article, and is written in the line of what Wikipedia is NOT, constituting some person's POV and OR, we are better off it. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:50, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - , POV, Unsourced, Fails GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 12:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.