Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daewoo FX212 Super Cruiser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 06:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daewoo FX212 Super Cruiser[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established by WP:GNG. No independent sources. Gold Standard 04:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as seems notable Davey2010 Talk 08:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It either is notable or it isn't. Per WP:GNG, it isn't, as there aren't multiple, independent, secondary sources.

Then find and add them. The sources only have to exist, they don't have to be in the article. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep There may be some sources on the internet about this buses to help make it notable however at it's present state it's not. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 19:17, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A distinct model of motor vehicle, which, by long-standing consensus, establishes notability. Coverage in foreign-language and offline sources should be found and added; a lack of current referencing in the article is not a reason to delete; a lack of English-language and/or online sources is also not a reason to delete. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.