Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYHH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Bantay Radyo#Radio stations;. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYHH[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in RS. Can be redirected to Bantay Radyo. MarioGom (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. MarioGom (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: All the sources in the article are reliable. The first two sources state that the station is licensed. Source 3) talks about the station's updates. The rest of the sources talk about the station under its former ownership. That said, though the station is off the air since 2015, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG 😎🙃 13:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Here's my source assessment:

Created with templates {{ORGCRIT assess table}} and {{ORGCRIT assess}}
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Secondary?	Overall value toward ORGCRIT
CEBU BROADCAST STATIONS
2021 NTC AM Stations
Bantay Radyo moves to new home
Nadela: Bangon Tipolo, mga hinabang gipaabot		– WP:RSOPINION
Bangon, mga Kauban
DYSB 864 kHz San Miguel Broadcasting Corp.

Yes, there are some reliable sources, but that is not sufficient to pass WP:GNG. For example, the first two sources are mere records (not significant coverage) and are primary sources. The third is not about DYHH specifically but about Bantay Radyo. It is only a passing mention, one sentence, about DYHH. For DYHH to pass WP:GNG, it requires multiple independent, secondary and reliable sources with significant coverage. That significant coverage needs to be specific about DYHH, because notability is not inherited. MarioGom (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:GNG per Astig's argument. Sources mentioned are reliable enough and secondary, with the ones mentioned by Astig in-depth IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 23:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: Nothing found with SIGCOV that would support a stand alone article. Name mentions, promo, database listings, are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV. Redirect per nom as an WP:ATD. // Timothy :: talk 04:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bantay Radyo#Radio stations; MarioGom's source assessment table above is spot-on, and demonstrates why this subject fails WP:N criteria. Left guide (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.