Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DATA (Digital Asset Transfer Authority)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
DATA (Digital Asset Transfer Authority)[edit]
- DATA (Digital Asset Transfer Authority) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:ORG, WP:CRYSTAL Organization in process of formation - not active.
The organization seems to be a web site and some press releases. It's way below the notability threshold for WP:ORG. It might be notable someday, but not yet. John Nagle (talk) 01:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agreed, way too soon to have article since not notable yet. Anything "emerging" needs to wait until it emerges first. All sorts of groups issue a couple press releases and then are never heard from again. Creator was single-purpose account Special:Contributions/Richardboase who made five edits on the day this article was created and none since. Clearly not the way we would title an article with acronym first and real name in parentheses anyway. W Nowicki (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. If this organization achieves its goals, it will likely become quite notable in time. But not yet. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.