Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Czech Republic–Libya relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. C 679 13:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Republic–Libya relations[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No content which cannot reasonably be included at Foreign relations of the Czech Republic and the equivalent page for Libya. Absence of significant coverage to warrant a standalone article. C 679 13:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. C 679 13:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. C 679 13:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. C 679 13:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. More information and sources are easily found. Historically, Czechoslovakia had close trade relations with Libya. It was a major weapons supplier[1] and in 1978 the government apparently granted Qaddafi the Order of the White Lion. At the beginning of the Libyan revolution, they backed Qaddafi[2], but following his defeat the Czech Republic moved quickly to reestablish trade ties.[3]. Last year, the Czech Republic has been providing training to Libyan judges.[4]. More info can be found in Report on the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic. Pburka (talk) 21:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as pburka indicates there is coverage of actual relations. LibStar (talk) 00:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pburka. There is verifiable evidence of close relations between the two countries, Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.