Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrus Cylinder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus Cylinder[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article heavily violates WP:NPOV and contains many unverifiable sources WP:NOTRELIABLE. Some claims raise a WP:REDFLAG, with some sections being highly opinionated WP:ORIGINAL and WP:LIKELY Xythianos (talk) 06:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep as SK1. These are clearly not reasons for deletion and the nomination is almost certainly pov. The editor has not brought up any concerns on the talk page and has not edited the article. I'd be surprised if there are ny unverifiable sources in the article. The nominator apparently doesn't like some of the content on interpretation but this is not an acceptable way to deal with such concerns. There is absolutely no question that the subject is notable. Dougweller (talk) 06:26, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, per above. If you are worried about the quality of the article, suggest a peer review. AFD is not for cleanup. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep and trout the nominator. LiteralKa (talk) 07:26, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Would someone please speedy keep this pov AfD?Dougweller (talk) 07:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.