Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuckold (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 19:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cuckold (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film; does not meet WP:NFILM. We cant just be giving articles to every film mentioned briefly mentioned in a few sources. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article was initally prod'd, and within a few minutes, I found several indepth reviews of the film to meet WP:GNG. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the reviews cited in the article. The nominator's statement about the film being "briefly mentioned in a few sources" is incorrect, even before Lugnuts' improvements. A full review in The Hollywood Reporter is not a brief mention. — Toughpigs (talk) 19:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article is even better now, but reviews in Vareity and the Hollywood Reporter made this not a great nom in the first place. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 10:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has significant secondary coverage in multiple reliable sources such as the aforementioned reviews so there is a pass of WP:GNG and deletion is unnecessary imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject passes WP:GNG. Abishe (talk) 01:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.