Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina García Rodero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cristina García Rodero[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP and does not satisfy WP:N at all regardless GSMR (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:ARTIST. I've added a source that calls her the "most celebrated documentary photographer in contemporary Spain." She also has articles in six other language Wikipedias, and ca:Cristina García Rodero and es:Cristina García Rodero have additional references that could be used to expand the article. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 17:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think she meets WP:GNG. My Spanish isn't that great but I think this article from El Mundo discusses her career and mentions that she was the first Spanish (female?) photographer admitted as a full member to Magnum Photos.[1] Another from El Pais states she took (official?) photos of the Spanish royals and also links to other articles about her.[2] Fuebaey (talk) 21:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Ample notability is demonstrated. She has had 4 books of her work published by established publishers; she has received 3 noteworthy awards (though one is in need of a reference); her work has been exhibited in noteworthy galleries; and she is a full member of Magnum Photos. -Lopifalko (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Perhaps a SNOW Keep at this point. She has won respected awards, a Google search shows plenty of WP:RS. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
. . . and does not satisfy WP:N at all regardless, pronounces GSMR. Regardless of what, GSMR? Her list of publications, perhaps? I've already augmented the list within the article. Care for some exhibitions? Tip for finding these: just look her up at Worldcat, and note the books, brochures and leaflets which, disinterested librarians have declared, accompanied this or that exhibition (place(s) and dates usually specified). Regardless of her membership of Magnum? ¶ Keep, duh. -- Hoary (talk) 05:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Meets WP:Artist. Nuff said.Canyouhearmenow 14:32, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.