Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (denomination) (2nd nomination)

Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (denomination)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (denomination)
• Articles for deletion/Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (denomination) (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church (denomination) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Micro-denomination of three churches with no reliable sources to establish notability via significant coverage. All existing sources fail to establish notability:

1. Link - Primary Source
2. Link - Appears to be a reliable source with coverage on page 15, but note on page 2 that the author of the coverage on page 15 is/was a senior leader within the subject of the article and thus this source is not independent.
3. Link. Self-published source of questionable reliability, not updated for a decade.
4. Link Primary source
5. Link - Erroneously cited and fails verification. The citation describes as "Doctrines of the Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church"; the actual title of the paper is different.
6. Link - Fails verification for notability; does not reference subject.
7. Link - Trivial/passing mention of denomination in longer discussion of one of its member churches
8. Link - Trivial/passing mention of denomination in longer discussion of one of its member churches
9. Link - Primary source
10. Link - Primary source
11. Link - This page is content copied from a self-published primary source formerly associated with the subject.
12. Link - Online directory page; equivalent to citing the Yellow Pages. Fails verification for notability.
13. Link - Primary source

Editors arguing for "Keep" in the 2022 non-consensus AfD discussion depended heavily on 2 and 5; however, as I've shown here, 2 is not an independent source for notability, and 5 fails verification. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Christianity, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)