Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coursera as a Technological Artefact for Learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion (A10). (Non admin closure) AllyD (talk) 06:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coursera as a Technological Artefact for Learning[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be evaluating the efficacy of Coursera as a teaching tool, drawing conclusions based on provided sources, which constitutes original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 23:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Completely agree with the above, it appears to be original research. Also, WP:NOTESSAY. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi WikiDan61 & Joseph2302, many thanks for your advice. I do understand that not every sentence in my articles are coming from a reference source. However, all conclusions I have ever made are based on research, data and theories. Would you please provide some examples that you consider as original research? I have no intention to mess around, and have been trying hard to maintain a neutral tone. Yet neutral does not equal to not critical. Thank you. Keep Gytgyt1234 (talk) 23:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Gytgyt1234 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

Delete: Original concept, can't find any reliable source that covers this topic. See Wikipedia is not a scientific journal. Esquivalience ^t 02:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.