Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cork Under-21 Football Championship
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cork Under-21 Football Championship[edit]
- Cork Under-21 Football Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This amateur, under-21-years-of-age, county-level, Gaelic football championship lacks requisite multiple independent substantial RS coverage. Epeefleche (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Part of a national (in fact international) competition: All-Ireland Under 21 Hurling Championship, removal of a "feeder" competition is nonsensical. Night of the Big Wind talk 11:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It fails to meet our notability criteria.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Clearly does not meet WP:ATH standards. 71.246.200.190 (talk) 01:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting, but the page you refer to is about players, not competitions. Night of the Big Wind talk 14:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione Message 11:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.