Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cork Junior B Football Championship
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. henrik•talk 13:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cork Junior B Football Championship[edit]
- Cork Junior B Football Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wholly unreferenced, so no evidence of notability per WP:GNG. The junior championship is the third level of competition in gaelic football, so it is hard to see a plausible claim for inherent notability. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:25, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:31, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The article itself claims that the competition is for the lowest level of Gaelic football. There is certainly no inherent notability, and no evidence that the WP:GNG will ever be satisfied. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. A county-wide, junior, amateur, sports competition that -- as pointed out -- is a low level of even county competitions in the county in question. Presumably, could have been a PROD. But I've AfD'd some similar articles myself to ensure some wider editor input on the general principle that articles such as these are not notable per wp standards, though they might well be of interest to certain individual editors/readers.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.