Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constructive Objects and the INtegration of processes and Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive Objects and the INtegration of processes and Systems[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable standard. An emerging standard in the construction industry, there is no sign of widespread acceptance within the industry. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the article is so poorly written, and so thoroughly obscure, that it is almost impossible for anyone not an expert in the field (whatever that field may be) to comment meaningfully on this proposal. The article cites no sources, so there is nothing from which anyone could determine that this is a standard that has received significant coverage in independent reliable sources, nor would I have a clue where to look for such sources based on the contents of the article. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 23:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Page 23 of this document defines COINS as an Emerging standard with Low adoption rate. That is really the most substantive information I could find on the standard. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This seems like an effort to promote a non-notable standard. bd2412 T 15:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – a search yields no significant attention by independent sources, so the topic must be deemed nonnotable. --Lambiam 18:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete - Markitecture advertisement for non-notable standard. as per above. DangerDogWest (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.