Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coney I-Lander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The sources greatly enhanced the subject's claim to notability. Nice find. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 14:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coney I-Lander[edit]

Orphaned page. Fails notability per WP:CORP and WP:REST. Kickstart70TC 06:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Regional chain dating back to 1926? They serve a specialized product. Seems notable to me. Needs references. Kickstart are you putting these up to get them improved and better referenced, or do you think they are non-notable? ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. I added a couple of external links for the sake of validity. Notability, I'm not so sure about. --Lockley (talk) 04:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:49, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being around since 1926 is not a reason for notability. WP:N, however, is. Tavix (talk) 22:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just added three sources talking about the restaurant and its history in some detail.ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.