Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine An

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Draft:Concubine An. BD2412 T 00:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concubine An[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge and Redirect to Jiaqing Emperor. WP:NOTEVERYTHING and article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. My WP:BEFORE turned up nothing. Similar article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concubine En was recently redirected. // Timothy :: talk 04:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 04:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 04:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Merge to Concubines of the Jiaqing Emperor. I expect there will be some more information about at least some of these women. The material as it stands isn’t enough to support a series of stand-alone articles but there is enough for a single article with a couple of paras in each of them.Mccapra (talk) 08:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creator requests the article be moved to Draftspace to continue development — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deidonata (talk • contribs) 09:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft so it can be worked on. Per the request of the article creator. With the caveat that it has to go through the AfC process before going back to the main article space. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify since the creator believes that with more work, notability can be shown. Mccapra (talk) 05:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.