Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Scheyen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Scheyen[edit]

Colin Scheyen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, NDIRECTOR. Didn't find much more than what was already there regarding external sources after a Google search South Nashua (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Anything here would be enough for a Wikipedia article if it were referenced to reliable source coverage about him in media, but none of it is strong enough to grant him a presumption of notability in the absence of a demonstrated WP:GNG pass. But the references here are all primary sources, which cannot support notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 20:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.