Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Heart Canyon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cold Heart Canyon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From Smartse's prod which was just removed by an IP (and marked as minor, too, which I think is wrong to do): I can't find any coverage in secondary reliable sources to demonstrate that this film is notable."" The article creator, Indie Movies, is constantly adding (and, in some cases, readding previously deleted) non-notable films and has been brought up on the conflict of interest noticeboard twice now (the latest showing that the IP may be a sockpuppet), bringing to light that every film is released by Maverick Entertainment Group. I'm going to go and AfD a lot of the films now... (sighs) Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 20:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Here's a list of all related AfDs.

That's it so far. The only other two articles (right now, anyway) are potentially notable. --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 22:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no reliable sources to establish notability. Alison22 (talk) 20:44, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If IMDB is the only source available, then that's plainly not enough. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NF. Johnuniq (talk) 03:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice toward recreation if/when film meets WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And thank you to the nominator for listing all his other AFD's here. He's given me a few hours of homework... but I was able to determine that some on his list actually merit inclusion, requiring only cleanup and sourcing ...no, not all.... but definitely some. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.