Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border Town

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Border Town[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Related to this AfD. This is sort of a pre-emptive strike to prevent re-creation (something the article creator has done before). Therefore, I'm removing the prods and bumping this up to an AfD. From my prod: "No indication of notability." The article creator, Indie Movies, is constantly adding (and, in some cases, re-adding previously deleted) non-notable films and has been brought up on the conflict of interest noticeboard twice now (the latest showing that they may have an IP sockpuppet), bringing to light that every film is released by Maverick Entertainment Group. Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 22:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 02:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NF. Johnuniq (talk) 03:06, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete ~~keep~~ I found ~~Film Intuition and~~ Richmond.com. ~~If there's more I'll remove the "weak".~~ Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:49, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The first source is Blogspot. Joe Chill (talk) 16:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.