Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clementina Velutini Couturier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. J04n(talk page) 13:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clementina Velutini Couturier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently a Venezuelan socialite. I am reluctant to nominate for deletion a person with an article in their language region's WP, but I dont think from what is given someone with her lack of career would be notable in the enWP. DGG ( talk ) 03:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the Spanish versino of this page at es:Clementina Velutini Couturier has been speedy deleted by es:user:Eduardosalg, so it's hard to see what it says. However, I don't think this meets our A7 criteria. Being a socialite is an important career, and it seems she had obituaries in the Venezualan national press. She is deceased, and I think the bar is little lower for dead people. I also think there is an inherent bias in Wikipedia against those not considered "notable" by their own actions, having acquired wealth, status and married people, even if there is plenty of coverage (and by one measure at least coverage = notability), and that is wrong, at least because I think Wikipedia editors are demonstrating their male gender bias. The alternative merge to her husband's article. OK, which one? Or do you just pick one at random? So I go for Keep. Barney the barney barney (talk) 17:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am not seeing anything here, whether in the article about travelling in the president's car or in the obituary notice and directions to the cemetery, that indicates notability in Wikipedia terms. The Spanish deletion as "el contenido era no enciclopédico" seems right. AllyD (talk) 05:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.