Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CitrusTV News

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CitrusTV News[edit]

Non-notable student news program with no evidence of third party notability outside of existing. Attempts to compromise with a redirect to the CitrusTV parent article have consistently been reverted leaving an AfD as the option. –– Lid^(Talk) 09:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non-notable campus broadcast. no significant 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The flagship news program of the nation's oldest and largest entirely student-run television station deserves mention and is significant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.230.155.3 (talk) 00:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)— 128.230.155.3 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep: Separate Wikipedia entires for individual shows in addition to an entry for the network/station from which they originate is consistent with how all other television shows and stations are listed. E.g. CNN. For consistency and user friendliness that is in line with how other television networks/stations and their shows are listed, this entry should be kept. More CitrusTV show-specific entries should be created to ensure the station and its shows' presence appears properly and consistently on Wikipedia. Instead of deletion or redirection, suggestions should be offered to help improve the notability and credibility of this article, and those actions will be taken. Ryanbalton (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note RyanBalton is the creator and, as to this point, only editor of the article in question. –– Lid^(Talk) 05:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication of notability, only 7 Ghits. Sorry, your show is not quite in the same league as CNN. JohnCD (talk) 14:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to parent company. the show appears to not be notable in and of itself. Firestorm (talk) 15:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Big suprise, the IP whos vote doesn't count comes from - Syracuse University, the same place as this article. And it's no suprise the article creator came here to defend it. @Ryan - it is up to YOU to provide the necessary 3rd party coverage that shows nobility for this article, otherwise it will be deleted as non-notable. ArcAngel (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @ArcAngel, thanks for being a douche. Hope it makes you feel better about yourself. 128.230.174.123 (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for playing Syracuse University. Have a nice day. ArcAngel (talk) 05:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To the IP editor: Wikipedia has a strict policy of not personally attacking people. Please do not continue. Firestorm (talk) 14:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @ArcAngel, take your own advice. Unless you really do need to be a cyberdouche to make yourself feel better. 128.230.174.123 (talk) 15:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't defend the article from being deleted then why bother posting here? You have been warned once about no personal attacks, and there you go attacking again. I have not done anything except point out that your IP is coming from Syracuse. ArcAngel (talk) 03:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep @ArcAngel, the word SUPRISE has an R before the P: Surprise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.230.174.123 (talk) 06:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reliable sources covering this show to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.