Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CinemaStone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:CORP. joe decker ^{talk to me} 14:49, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CinemaStone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion, pure and simple, does not pass WP:CORP, 1,000 page hits on Google, all the usual suspects of self-generated listings on various websites. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 13:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete as nom per all of the above. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 13:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Nominator doesn't need to !vote also.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources to be found. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can find no sources either, apart from business listings. No evidence of wider notability. Sionk (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No coverage. SL93 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.