Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cine Capri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 22:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cine Capri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. It makes no claim for general notability WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance WP:NBUILD. WP:BEFORE revealed normal WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL mentions/promos/ads, and directory style listings. // Timothy :: talk 23:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 23:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 23:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep This is a very well know landmark in Phoenix and covered in dozens of articles. A quarter-million people signed a petition to save it from demolition. The article needs better referencing. MB 03:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Like with Los Arcos, the problem here is lack of sourcing. There is also apparently a story from 1997 in Preservation magazine on the demolition; it is, like Los Arcos, going to clobber the GNG. Next time you see an article on a Phoenix-area topic, call on me or MB, because we have the Newspapers.com access to fix this sort of stuff. Here's just a taste: [1], [2], [3][4], [5] Raymie (t • c) 07:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Easily passes WP:NBUILD. Just needs to be properly referenced. SportingFlyer T·C 17:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.