Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianné Allen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christianné Allen[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Christianné Allen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails notability Thewritestuff92 (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge this article with Rudy_Giuliani. Subject fails notability. See, e.g.:

That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A
— WP:INVALIDBIO

Another issue arises when an individual plays a major role in a minor event. In this case, it is not generally appropriate to have separate articles on the person and the event. Generally in this case, the name of the person should redirect to the article on the incident, especially if the individual is only notable for that incident and it is all that the person is associated with in the source coverage.
— WP:1E

An article under the title of a person's name should substantially be a full and balanced biography of that person's public life. If the person is notable only in connection with a single event, and little or no other information is available to use in the writing of a balanced biography, that person should be covered in an article regarding the event, with the person's name as a redirect to the event article placing the information in context. If the event itself is not notable enough for an article, and the person was noted only in connection with it, it's very likely that there is no reason to cover that person at all.
— WP:PSEUDO

Thewritestuff92 (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and United States of America. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless there is a valid reason to include coverage of her in either Rudy Giuliani or Giuliani Partners. (In which case, merge per nom.) Neither of those articles currently mention her, and I don't think that shoehorning one BLP into another purely for the sake of retaining content is really a great practice. Absent some indication of encyclopedic significance it might just be better to let this one go. -- Visviva (talk) 03:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - not sure why she received so much attention but sources appear to give her enough coverage for notability. - Indefensible (talk) 02:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.