Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinmaya Vidyalaya, Bokaro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chinmaya Vidyalaya, Bokaro[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school. Fails WP:NSCHOOL RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the subject is notable in my opinion. PangolinPedia 08:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the references on the article are primary which do not meet WP:NSCHOOL, I searched for reference and found many minor mentions but nothing that meets "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." WP:GNG

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT) or NBUILD. Sources in the article are archived pages from the school website. BEFORE showed nothing. Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in-depth. Article does not meet NBUILD, "…they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage, the type all schools receive in local press. This is a normal school, not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 20:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.