Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Childs Way Charter School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Childs Way Charter School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. // Timothy :: talk 06:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 06:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 06:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources seem to be only local and trivial coverage. Nothing about this from what I have seen passes WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Not surprising really. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no independent, in-depth coverage of this school that I could find. I did find one more source, but it is a directory listing similar to what already exists in the article. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the coverage is routine and not enough to pass the standards as mentioned in the nom Spiderone 22:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a 7 year school with an average of 7 students per grade, and sometimes as few as 3, is not default notable. The sourcing does not overcome this just plain not notable problem.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.