Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherif Merzouki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cherif Merzouki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, seems page created solely because he was listed in a book of Algerian artists Caffeyw (talk) 02:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep. As I noted in two related AfDs, that mention may well be enough. Please explain here why it wouldn't be and ping me so I can respond. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The book is simply a listing Algerian artists. If you painted one picture and are Algerian you would be included in the book. The second book is nothing but an updated version of the 1st. There's no articles about the subject, no reviews of their artwork. Basically someone went down the list of everyone in the book and created one line bios for all of them. The French Wiki doesn't even have pages for most of them, and the few that do are only one or two sentences. Caffeyw (talk) 08:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Caffeyw yes, but we can not acces to all book, this is problem, for article page 32 to 62 no access to the public, i want see all reference into the book, I have not this book, possible i will ask for that first. And i add to article too.Thank you --Great11 (talk) 14:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep notable--Great11 (talk) 02:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: Let us wait one more week.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 10:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.